You are reading the article Is This Company’s Move The Key To Australia’s Cancer Battle? updated in February 2024 on the website Flu.edu.vn. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Is This Company’s Move The Key To Australia’s Cancer Battle?This company is bringing cancer treatment to regional centres throughout Australia to make care easier to access for more patients. Key Takeaways
Throughout Australia, cancer patients may have to travel great distances for radiotherapy or chemotherapy treatments.
In Australia in 2023, more than 160,000 cancer cases were diagnosed with almost 50,000 deaths across the 12-month period.
Icon Group is Australia’s largest provider of private cancer care and operates also in Southeast Asia, China and New Zealand.
World-class, easy-to-access cancer treatments are closer to home for many patients as Icon Group expands the number of regional centres in Australia it operates and grows further overseas.
Innovation in communication has meant “it doesn’t matter where our experts are geographically located,” says Icon Group CEO Mark Middleton.
“We can bring their knowledge to help their colleagues no matter where they’re located. This concept of a network of world-class cancer care is really what has driven us.”
Throughout Australia, cancer patients may have to travel great distances for radiotherapy or chemotherapy treatments. For some the options are restrictive and some choose to forgo treatments because of the difficulties. World Cancer Day is February 4 this year, with a theme of Close the Care Gap.
Icon Group is Australia’s largest provider of private cancer care and operates also in Southeast Asia, China and New Zealand. Middleton started the business with its first radiotherapy centre in Toowoomba, in Queensland in 2007, and it became Icon Group in 2014, with capabilities including chemotherapy, compounding pharmacy services and medical oncology.
“We’re very fortunate in Australia. We have a wonderful healthcare system. But there’s still been a lack of access to really specialised services such as radiation oncology. We’ve harnessed innovation and technology to reach more people,” he says in an interview with Forbes Australia.
Cancer is one of the world’s leading causes of death, according to the World Health Organization. An estimated 20 million people were diagnosed with cancer in 2023, and 10 million died. WHO forecasts these numbers will continue to rise in the decades ahead.
In Australia in 2023, more than 160,000 cancer cases were diagnosed with almost 50,000 deaths across the 12-month period.
“If the treatment you need is an hour and a half away, so a three-hour round trip, and a treatment like radiotherapy is every day, you need to make a choice,” he says. “We want to try and lessen the distances people are travelling because what that brings with it is a pretty devastating choice. If it’s too hard to access the treatment, maybe I won’t have it. That’s a choice that patients and their families are still making every day in Australia.”
In some locations, Icon partners with the public health sector and Middleton says he would like to see more collaboration. “I think that is a real key to the future of cancer care in Australia, and how we can reach more people,” he says.
Icon is still very much focused on growth in Australia, with 30% of its centres in regional areas in the country, but is expanding business in Singapore and has six cancer centres in mainland China.
Innovations in the technology being used has helped doctors and nurses with treatment and training.
“A doctor in a centre in Mildura could be joined by a video conference by our expert in Sydney talking to a patient in Mildura. We can do that globally,” Middleton says. “It’s about removing geographical barriers from expertise and capability. We are also able to deliver training remotely.”
He says one of the biggest barriers to the most effective treatment for patients is getting information.
“A cancer diagnosis gives you a lot to take in. We recently did a survey of cancer patients about the barriers they face in accessing care and one of the top barriers is access to timely information,” he says.
With research partner Healthcare Management Advisors (HMA), chúng tôi Australia has been focusing on cancer care navigation.
Professor John Zalcberg, co-chair of the chúng tôi Australia Steering Committee and Head of the Cancer Research Program, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine School of Public Health at Monash University, says a more integrated approach to cancer care navigation would make it easier for those diagnosed with cancer to navigate through Australia’s complex health system.
“The efforts to investigate a single model that can benefit all Australians diagnosed with cancer has the potential to transform cancer care delivery. While the economic analysis of our research shows strong return on investment, it is the ability to better utilise existing services and create better connectivity that will make a huge difference to patients,” said Professor Zalcberg.
You're reading Is This Company’s Move The Key To Australia’s Cancer Battle?
Initial Coin Offerings for new cryptocurrencies are designed to maximize buzz and satisfy the urge to get in on the “next big thing.” And the media headlines are also fueling the recent ICO craze:“$150 Million raised in 52 seconds,” “Sold out in 7.5 Seconds,” and “Thousands of Frustrated Investors Locked Out.”
Often these initiatives are driven by small groups of highly technical engineers with little real world business experience. Instead of designing projects that leverage the blockchain with the goal of solving pressing problems, they have largely remained grounded in two main camps. First, the projects that are merely trying to copy the success of bitcoin and Ethereum by bringing out speculative coins, and second those that adapt the blockchain to very specialized niche sectors.
Unfortunately, many of the highly publicized ICOs have yet to carry out much beyond upgrading the lifestyles of their founders and promoters. And while the numbers sound impressive, the ICO fever has barely made a splash beyond the borders of the tiny pond called “crypto”.
In fact, one of the primary concerns of the cryptocurrency ecosphere is how to encourage the sector to go more mainstream. In order for the market to continue to grow, it is necessary for projects to reach out beyond the normal borders and bring in more users who haven’t previously participated.
On a small-scale, this is already starting to happen.
In May of this year a barely hyped ICO took place. Called VIVA, you most likely didn’t hear a word about it. After all, the team behind it had less than $6,000 for marketing and no major publications gave them coverage. It took them 21 days to raise a little over $600K, and now they’re poised to deliver some astonishing results.
VIVA’s vision is to cut economic inequality by leveraging blockchain technologies in a way that provides longterm financial security for ordinary people around the globe.
I reached out to Dawn Parker-Waites, CEO of VIVA, and asked her some questions:Why didn’t anyone hear about you, and why did you raise so little?
Well, to be honest, I think we did exceptionally well given the limitations in time and resources. This ICO was for VIVA Crowns – a very powerful software license which grants significant influence within the VIVAconomy. They were expensive and were only available on our TradeQwik exchange.What were you trying to accomplish, and was the raise sufficient?
We were working to spread the word about VIVA especially with early adopters and entrepreneurs. We accomplished that very well. [Also,] we needed to raise the funds to guarantee the development costs for the first phase. We did that too.What makes VIVA different, and when will people be able to see concrete results?
VIVA is much more than a cryptocurrency. It is an entire economic platform that turns the traditional financial sector upside down. Not only does it help the growth of new blockchain business applications, but each transaction helps build longterm financial stability for all the people who take part in the VIVAconomy. As for results, we are currently planning the launch for some of the first products we promised.
Read more about cryptocurrency at TechCo
When two companies merged to form consulting and accounting firm Eide Bailly LLP in May 1998, the new management team mapped out plans to move employees into new corporate headquarters and to move up to a higher speed network.
The two firms had relied on 16Mbps token ring and 10Mbps Ethernet wiring hubs. But rather than go through a series of incremental bandwidth increases, management at the Fargo, N.D., firm took the bull by the horns and went for the top echelon of high-speed backbones. Officials began comparing Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), which now has a top speed of 2.4Gbps, and Gigabit Ethernet, which operates at 1Gbps.
They arrived at a decision quickly. “We thought Gigabit Ethernet offered us a more familiar network environment and more configuration flexibility than ATM,” says David Stone, IS manager at Eide Bailly.
Source: Dell’Oro Group
IT officials at many other corporations are reaching the same conclusion. Even though vendors completed Gigabit Ethernet standards only in the summer of 1998, the technology is rapidly moving into corporate backbone networks. Worldwide Gigabit Ethernet revenue for enterprise networks is projected to reach $1.2 billion in 1999, surpassing ATM revenue, according to the Dell’Oro Group, a Portola Valley, Calif., market research firm (see chart, “The buck goes to Gigabit Ethernet”).
Suppliers also see momentum shifting from ATM to Gigabit Ethernet. “We are pumping more research and development dollars into our Gigabit Ethernet products than our ATM products because we think they will deliver a better return,” says Luc Roy, director of product marketing at Nortel Networks Inc., in Santa Clara, Calif.
Corporate interest in Gigabit Ethernet is growing for a number of reasons. Its lower pricing, simpler installation, and lesser training requirements, along with a clear migration path, head the list. While some companies are opting for ATM because it handles multimedia more adeptly, most feel more comfortable selecting Gigabit Ethernet for their backbones.
Gigabit Ethernet steps forward
Cost is always a factor in the corporate IT equation. Among networking options, Ethernet is less complex and generates higher volume sales than alternatives, leading to relatively low prices for Ethernet and Fast Ethernet wares.
AT A GLANCE: Eide Bailly LLP
The company: Formed through the merger of two accounting firms, Eide Bailly offers consulting and accounting services to businesses and individuals through 10 offices in six states.
The problem: After the merger, the firm needed a better option speed-wise than either the 10Mbps Ethernet or the 16Mbps token ring networks that had supported the individual operations.
The solution: 3Com Corp.’s SuperStack II. Eide Bailly opted for a Gigabit Ethernet switch, which would be less expensive, simpler to install, and easier to maintain than an ATM option.
Adding to the appealing price is the fact that many companies have already selected Ethernet to support other networking needs. Several years ago, 10Mbps Ethernet became the de facto desktop technology and erased token ring from the corporate networking map. In the same timeframe, the delivery of 100Mbps Ethernet switches offered companies a clear migration path from lower speed versions of Ethernet. As a result, Fast Ethernet became the primary way corporations connected their servers and helped to push alternative technologies such as Fiber Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) into oblivion. Selecting Gigabit Ethernet for backbone connections means a company can stick with one network option across its entire enterprise, thereby simplifying installation and maintenance.
That flexibility appealed to Eide Bailly officials. “Once the higher speed connections were operating, we felt we could move our 10Mbps Ethernet hubs to our remote offices since they are relatively simple to maintain,” says Stone.
So IT officials looked at Gigabit Ethernet products from 3Com Corp., Cabletron Inc., Cisco Systems Inc., and Nortel Networks. They chose 3Com’s SuperStack II because it had a flexible design, and at $60,000, it cost 10% to 15% less than competitors’ products, notes Stone.
Moving to the higher-speed option required minimal training for Eide Bailly’s technicians. Many vendors have delivered management tools that examine Ethernet packets, which are the same for the 10Mbps, 100Mbps, and 1Gbps versions, so network administrators will have a good understanding of how higher-speed switches will work alongside their slower counterparts.
In addition, many companies want to use one network protocol (TCP/IP) to carry all of their corporate traffic, and Gigabit Ethernet accommodates that desire. “When a company mixes ATM and TCP/IP, Ethernet packets have to be converted to ATM cells, which can decrease performance and increase network complexity,” says Nortel’s Roy.
Vendors are voicing the same interest in Gigabit Ethernet. Established vendors Cabletron, Cisco, Lucent Technologies Inc., Nortel, and 3Com joined start-ups Alteon WebSystems Inc., Extreme Networks and Foundry Networks Inc., to deliver such products. This intense competition is one of the reasons why the Dell’Oro Group expects Gigabit Ethernet pricing to drop from $1,600 per port in 1997 to less than $500 in 2000.
Even the healthiest people sometimes get sick. And even the best-protected companies can catch a virus. As with human health, the true test of a network’s well-being comes in how quickly it fights off or recovers from an illness.
To keep computer viruses, worms, Trojan Horses, and other nasties that fall under the umbrella title of “malicious code” away, most companies simply deploy anti-virus software.
But what happens if the anti-virus vendor gets sick? Just ask Symantec Corp., of Cupertino, Calif. Earlier this month, the company received a message from hackers threatening to unleash a worm via e-mail. Luckily, employees in the Netherlands perceived the threat quickly. Executives in San Jose then deleted the message and repelled the infection with Symantec’s security software, says company spokesperson Richard Saunders.
AT A GLANCE: Willamette Industries Inc.
The company: Based in Portland, Ore., Willamette Industries grows trees, harvests them, and makes paper and wood products. The company employs 14,000 people in over 100 manufacturing sites and 150 facilities worldwide, ranging from single-person offices to the 5,000-person corporate headquarters in Portland.
The problem: Periodic attacks from “malicious programs,” including both computer viruses and worms.
The solution: Anti-virus software from Symantec Corp., which runs on servers, e-mail gateways, and desktops to intercept potential infiltration. Almost daily updates via the Internet provide up-to-the-minute support.
The IT infrastructure: Approximately 4,000 computer users run Windows95–about 80% of whom use Compaq Computer Corp. desktop computers, while 15% to 20% use IBM laptops. The firewall is a combination of a Cisco router and an unspecified Linux box running homegrown software. Willamette uses a Compaq ProLiant mail server, and the PCs run Microsoft Mail. Each site has a LAN attached to the company intranet through dial-up and T1 connections.
The lesson to be learned is that no network–no matter how secure–is totally immune. And while the best option is to avoid computer viruses, the next best alternative is to know how to quickly recover, as Symantec did, when your network does get sick. Remember to be aggressive. Deploying anti-virus software is a good start. Establishing and implementing a set of best practices and policies should be next on your agenda. If your network is compromised, having a plan can save time and a lot of headaches in the IT department.
Willamette Industries Inc. has taken this lesson to heart. The $4 billion integrated forest products company based in Portland, Ore., uses Symantec’s integrated Norton AntiVirus product, combined with regular updates, careful inspection of all incoming files, and end user education. This system has made for a more secure environment.
Despite these checks and balances, the company earlier this year caught the Melissa virus. A macro virus that made the rounds in March by getting into users’ systems through a Microsoft Corp. Office document, Melissa then replicated itself, and sent out copies via e-mail using Microsoft Outlook. Melissa propagated itself up to 50 times with each user it successfully infected. According to a recent survey conducted by Icsa Inc., a Reston, Va., provider of Internet security assurance services, there were 7.6 infections per 1,000 PCs during the week Melissa was released. The chance of encountering Melissa was around 30 per 1,000 PCs per month. Of the almost 5,000 PC users surveyed during or after Melissa, 3,650 reported having been infected.
Melissa managed to infect two servers at Willamette, one at corporate headquarters and one in a branch office in the Southwest, according to Robert Woods, PC systems manager for the company. “A few of our servers were slowed down by the volume of mail, but it was more of an annoyance than anything else,” Woods says.
Fortunately, the impact was minimal because IT officials identified the problem, isolated the systems, and got them fixed quickly.
Press and Internet warnings had alerted Willamette to the virus. “We were aware that Melissa was a possibility, so we sent out a notification to all users via e-mail, telling them what to look out for and reminding them of the policies we had in place,” says Woods.
Willamette’s early warning system kept Melissa in check until a cure was found. As a result, IT officials watched the virus–mostly inert–in its system for about two days, until Symantec issued the “inoculation” that would scrub the virus out. It was distributed, and that was that.
In 1993, the federally funded Computer Emergency Response Team handled 1,334 incidents. By 1998, it was up to 3,734 incidents, and in the first third of 1999, the number was 1,795.
Thus, quick response on the part of the company and the supplier averted what was for other companies a period of costly downtime. “Damages from viruses can range from mere annoyance … to the obliteration of critical data resources,” says Bill Pollak, a spokesperson for the federally funded Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) Coordination Center at Carnegie Mellon University, in Pittsburgh.
Enough to make you sick
Know your enemy
Types of “malicious software”
Virus: A computer program that makes copies of itself and needs a host program. It may be destructive, but that isn’t the primary goal of the program. It may try to hide to avoid detection.
Spam: A mass e-mail mailing, which can clog up a system almost as much as a worm. More annoying than dangerous, spam wastes time and systems resources. It can often be filtered out by the corporate server or firewall.
Bug: Programming error that causes computer software to misbehave–or, more often, not work at all. Bugs are not intentionally malicious, but can cause damage nonetheless. Also, virus writers can sometimes exploit known bugs for their own purposes.
Virus hoax: A message warning of a nonexistent virus. These warnings propagate quickly, like all rumors. They frequently spread over e-mail. They cause panic among users and force IT to waste time squelching the rumors. Some anti-virus vendors are considering adding known hoax e-mail filters to their software.
Spam: A mass e-mail mailing, which can clog up a system almost as much as a worm. More annoying than dangerous, spam wastes time and systems resources. It can often be filtered out by the corporate server or firewall.
The use of the term virus is somewhat inaccurate, since a computer virus is only one of several types of malicious programs that can wreak havoc with a company’s network. But colloquially, virus can be used interchangeably with mal-ware, or malicious software.
Viruses are classified by the way they infect systems, says CERT’s Pollak. File viruses attack executable files, boot viruses infect boot sectors of hard and floppy disks, and macro viruses are data files written to exploit the macro commands available to Microsoft Word and other applications.
Today, 80% of all viruses are macro viruses, according to Carie Nachenberg, chief researcher for Symantec’s Anti-virus Resource Center. “It used to be the floppy disk, but today, a machine can get infected surfing the net, or from executables from Usenet [news] groups.”
“It’s way beyond the benign stage,” adds Michael Erbschloe, vice president of research for Computer Economics Inc., an independent research firm in Carlsbad, Calif. According to the company’s survey of about 2,000 customers using computers, from which it received about 150 responses, Erbschloe figures that companies worldwide lost $7.6 billion in the first half of 1999 because of computer viruses–that’s more than five times the losses for all of 1998. “That includes about $1.4 billion to clean up results of the virus,” he explains. “And the rest was lost productivity.”
QoS is best for multimedia connections
An engineering axiom states that it’s easier to add features early in the design rather than retrofit them later. Ethernet and TCP/IP were designed to handle data transmissions, which are more forgiving than video or voice connections, so enhancing TCP/IP to support multimedia transmissions has been challenging.
Currently, information travels across most Ethernet networks in a random fashion. In a series of 10 packets, packet No. 8 may arrive at the destination before packet No. 6. The computer at the receiving end reorders the packets so the information is presented correctly to an end user.
Packet arrival order is not important with most data applications, but it is vital with video and voice transmissions. If packets arrive out of sequence, a video transmission may jumble or a voice connection may become garbled.
Bandwidth contention is a related problem. On an Ethernet network, bandwidth is parceled out on the fly. Suppose a user begins sending a large file when no one else is using the network and the transmission starts out fine. If a neighbor then starts to access a database, the transmission could slow to a crawl. With a file transfer, the only impact is that the user has to wait a bit longer.
Video and voice applications cannot tolerate such fluctuations. If two users are conversing and the available bandwidth shrinks, a transmission will jar or possibly break completely. So these applications require bandwidth to be available throughout the session.
Quality of service (QoS) solves these problems by opening up a clear communication line between two end points so packets can move unencumbered. ATM was designed from the ground up to support this capability.
In recent years, vendors have worked to retrofit QoS for Ethernet. While they’ve made progress, the options are not as robust as those found with ATM. “ATM now offers users four classes of services with three widely deployed; that is not the case with TCP/IP,” says Carl Engineer, director of marketing at Cisco Systems Inc.’s eWan Business Unit, in San Jose, Calif.
It’s not clear whether IP proponents will be able to match the level of QoS functionality that ATM offers. “IP equipment vendors must overcome a series of significant technical challenges to match ATM QoS,” notes Tim Hale, senior product marketing manager at 3Com Corp.’s Marlboro, Mass., office. “Can they be solved? I don’t see how it will be done, but I’ve learned in this business never to say never.” —P.K.
The world of blockchain has come a long way in the past decade, rapidly moving through new technologies and pushing the bounds of what we thought possible. Yet, despite leaps and bounds of the technological side, we’re still lagging behind when it comes to regulation and structures to finance.
Existing in this grey area, many exchanges still use financial structures that are popular within centralized finance. We can see this with some of the world’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges, which operate using centralized tactics of being a middle-man party and accepting money for trades.
This system, without the regulation that centralized finance has, creates a number of oversights that could be exploited. This was most famously seen with FTX, which imploded in 2023 after it came out that they were removing user funds from the platform. Without any regulation, there were no central bodies that could verify that the money was truly there, allowing Sam Bankman-Fried and associates to use the money for other endeavors.
As events like these shake the cryptocurrency community, we are reminded that decentralized finance should be exactly that – decentralized. Recently, exchanges like StormGain have made waves within the world of cryptocurrency for their new stance on user funds. They, acting in the spirit of being fully decentralized, have enacted a no-deposit policy to keep their community as safe and secure as can be.
Let’s dive into the world of centralized exchanges, pointing out the stark shift that needs to occur for this industry to truly stabilize.Why Are Centralized Exchanges a Problem for Blockchain?
The core of blockchain as an entire industry is founded upon transparency, authenticity, and peer-to-peer operations. With that in mind, centralized exchanges that act as intermediaries and don’t disclose where they hold user funds are the antithesis of everything this industry should stand for.
While some centralized DeFi exchanges have started to release proof of holdings, this isn’t enough. As we’ve seen with FTX, the risk is simply too great for cryptocurrency investors to take on. Especially with the current climate of this industry, with leading cryptos falling from all-time highs, most projects are already standing on fairly thin ice. If there were to be another major event, it would shake the crypto community and push it into a territory that could potentially be impossible to recover from.
While centralized exchanges provide a level of familiarity for users, the fact that they hold user funds on-platform in platform-owner wallets is too much of a risk. Without the regulation in place to stop nefarious acts from occurring, investors will not flock back to centralized cryptocurrency exchanges any time soon.
What’s more, centralized exchanges can lock users out of their accounts whenever they choose. This can happen at any moment, and is exactly why users couldn’t drain their accounts on FTX when things started going awry. Simply put, centralized DeFi exchanges have too much power over user funds and accounts.
In our peer-to-peer system, we should demand better.Moving Away from the Past and to a New Era of Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Some exchanges within the world of cryptocurrency are looking to change the current norm of using centralized DeFi exchanges in the hope of bringing about a more user-focused system for all. For example, StormGain is an exchange that has recently announced the release of StormGain DEX. Within this DEX, users are offered one extremely simple solution – they never have to deposit funds into the platform.
Instead of forcing users to connect a wallet and then enter funds into the platform for trading and exchange, StormGain DEX has taken a different strategy. Once a user connects their cold wallet – a wallet that they and only they have control and access to – they can invest on the platform without needing to transfer money to the middle-man.
The total amount that the investor wants to put into a cryptocurrency leaves the wallet and is directly invested from the wallet itself. This approach allows users to retain complete control over all of their user funds. Instead of having to hope that their centralized DeFi platform will honor their funds and use them correctly, StormGain removes all uncertainty.
Exchanges like StormGain DEX are a fantastic example of exactly what the cryptocurrency community needs to strive for if we are to overcome our tumultuous history. At present, most of the community is afraid to invest, with routine investments decreasing in total value across the industry over the past year.
With events like FTX being all too common and potentially happening again with other centralized exchanges like Coinbase or Binance, people are too wary to get back into this market. If exchanges took a leaf from StormGain and followed their example, the industry could create a much safer platform to invest from.
When users feel confident that their money won’t be scammed, stolen from them, or frozen in their accounts, then we will see the cryptocurrency market return to its previous bullish stance.Final Thoughts
The world of decentralized exchanges has now seen just how disastrous it can be to stray from the principles of being decentralized. With FTX in recent memory, both community members and exchange boards are looking for ways to distance themselves from centralized exchange practices.
Although we’re slightly pining for a completely new Mario Kart, this Deluxe version of the Wii U game is worth picking up whether you’ve played its predecessor to death or you’re completely new to the series. While racing isn’t hugely changed by the addition of double weapons, the new battle modes and arenas fix the biggest problem with Mario Kart 8.Best Prices Today: Mario Kart 8 Deluxe
At launch, the Nintendo Switch was all about Zelda: Breath of the Wild but there’s finally a new major franchise game in town and it’s part of one of the most liked series to date. Here we review the exciting Mario Kart 8 Deluxe.
First things first, this edition of Mario Kart is not a completely new game. Although we were perhaps a little bit disappointed when it was announced for the Switch, Nintendo hasn’t made out like it’s a whole new title.
The name tells you what you need to know really and while we’re keen to get racing on Mario Kart 9, this Deluxe edition of the Wii U Mario Kart is well worth getting to tide you over thanks to plenty of tweaks and new content. Read next: Best Nintendo Switch gamesPlaying Mario Kart 8 Deluxe on the Switch
One of the major things about Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is not so much the game itself, but the way the new Switch console allows you to play it.
The game is essentially the same as before in TV Mode, but the portable and versatile console means you can take Mario Kart anywhere you go using Handheld Mode. You’re unlikely to feel the need to take your DS and Mario Kart 7 any longer.
It really comes into its own using Tabletop Mode, though, as you can play two-player anywhere with the Joy-cons. The screen is a little bit small but it’s totally doable and hardly something you can do on other devices. We, along with a bunch of friends, had a great time playing in this mode at the pub – just be careful with your drinks!
That’s not all as the Switch can wirelessly connect to other consoles, meaning you can play with up to eight people using four devices – in TV or Tabletop modes. If you connect over LAN (Ethernet adapters required) you can have up to 12.
It’s pretty tricky playing with the Joy-cons on their own so it’ll be worth spending a few quid on the official Jon-Con Wheels (just £13.99 for a pair), even if you don’t use gyro steering, or something like Gioteck’s Duo Grips.What’s new in Mario Kart 8 Deluxe?
Although Deluxe is a new version of the Wii U Mario Kart 8, it often feels like a new game thanks to a shed load of new content and features. Before we launch into it all, you won’t need to spend time unlocking tracks, characters and modes – it’s all available from the off. You can still unlock more vehicles and wheels etc. See also: Switch vs Wii U comparison.
That means Mario Kart 8 Deluxe offers a whopping 42 characters and 48 tracks so you can jump straight into that glorious (or outrageously frustrating) action. The game includes all the DLC content from the Wii U such as four extra cups (16 tracks), characters and vehicles.
New characters include Dry Bones, Bowser Jr., King Boo and Inklings from Splatoon. There are also new vehicles, weapons and more.
Here are some of the key new features in Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, most of which we’ll talk about in more detail:Mario Kart 8 Deluxe Battle Modes
It’s with great joy we can say that Mario Kart 8 Deluxe fixes this flaw with a whopping five battle modes to choose from and eight arenas in which play them. Read next: Switch vs Xbox One.
Here’s an overview of the five modes:
It would take us too long to go through each of the modes but they’re all great in different ways and will suit different styles of play – some work better on certain arenas. We particularly like Renegade Roundup and the extremely stressful Shine Thief modes.
Many can be played in either teams or individually and with plenty of control over other settings such as which vehicles and weapons are allowed. One of our only complains is the inability to choose 4v4 in battle – particularly when you want all-human players verses CPU in modes like Renegade Roundup.
As mentioned earlier one of the two new weapons is the Feather and this will only be found in battle games. It allows you to jump over objects or players and takes some skill to master with the latter but you’ll be rewarded if you can pull it off.
You’ll also want to make use of the new U-turn manoeuver in battles which is like a handbrake turn on ice. To perform this, simply slam the brakes on and turn.Mario Kart 8 Deluxe Racing
Regular racing isn’t half as dramatically different compared to battle but there are still a few things to mention here.
The biggest tweak is being able to hold two weapons at the same time, although you can’t switch between them at will like Double Dash. You can fill both slots in one go by driving through the double staked item boxes on courses. The other new item alongside the Feather is Boo who can steal an item from another player at random and turns you invisible to avoid getting hit.
This makes racing more fun at times, providing you with the opportunity to get further up the field with potentially six red shells. We do feel, however, that perhaps the player in first place should be limited to one weapon as they can end up with a bit too much protection at times.
For skilled racers, there’s now a third level of mini-turbo so if you can drift tight enough you’ll get a pink boost and be off like a rocket.
If you’re not even at the stage of drifting then Nintendo has added some features for you too. It can be frustrating playing experienced drivers so Smart Steering and Auto-acceleration mean that beginners won’t end up rage quitting due to falling off Rainbow Road 100 times in one race.
A handy antenna lights up at the back of your vehicle to let you know it’s kicking in so you can improve.
If you have updated to Windows 11 and would like to move the Taskbar from the bottom of the screen to the top of the screen. This article will show you how to manually move the Windows 11 Taskbar to the top of the screen. An option that isn’t present within the personalisation section of Windows 11.
Related: How to turn off Content Adaptive Brightness Control (CABC) on Windows 11.
After updating to Windows 11 from Windows 10 and older versions of Windows, a lot of users have noticed that many of the customisation options they are used to have been removed or deprecated. For example, it is no longer possible to move the Taskbar from the bottom of the screen to any other location. The option to move it to the top, left, or right of the screen has been removed entirely.
This option requires a few quick changes in the Windows 11 registry, so make so you have created a System Restore point for starting the steps shown below. This will allow you to revert back to a safe point should you make a mistake.
Quick steps to move the taskbar to the top of the screen on Windows 11:
Open the Registry Editor by searching Regedit from the Start menu.
Go to: ComputerHKEY_CURRENT_USERSoftwareMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionExplorerStuckRects3
In the new window that appears count 5 lines in then go down to the second row.
Finally, Restart your computer and the change will take effect.
How do you move the Taskbar to the top on Windows 11? Move the Windows 11 Taskbar to the top of the screen.
To begin, open the Windows Registry Editor by typing regedit into the Start menu and selecting it when it appears.
Next, use the left-hand pane to navigate to the following location:
A new window will open showing a long complex grid of letters and numbers.
Go to the second row and count 5 lines in and change the number from 03 to 01.
If you want to change the taskbar back to the bottom, you’ll need to return to the same location and repeat the process. However, this time change the value from 01 to 03. Then Restart your computer once again. If you have followed the steps in this guide and haven’t had the Taskbar move to the top of your screen, there is a good chance that Microsoft has patched out the option. Sadly they do this all the time so we’ll have to wait for the next workaround, one that hopefully allows you to move the taskbar on Windows 11 to the left or right also.
Update the detailed information about Is This Company’s Move The Key To Australia’s Cancer Battle? on the Flu.edu.vn website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!